Designing Board Game Malik Fadjar untuk Menumbuhkan Pembelajaran Mendalam: Sebuah Penelitian Tindakan Kelas

Authors

  • Ahmad Sulaiman
    Indonesia Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Kota Malang , Indonesia
  • Hafizh Maulana
    Indonesia Universitas Brawijaya, Kota Malang , Indonesia
  • Arif Bawono Surya
    Indonesia PT. Mari Bermain Indonesia (LetsPlay.id), Kota Malang , Indonesia
  • Istivano Andrianus Aprilwanda
    Indonesia PT. Mari Bermain Indonesia (LetsPlay.id), Kota Malang , Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53621/xtmw2f88

Keywords:

Abdul Malik Fadjar, Educational Psychology, Creativity, Game-Based Learning, Project Based-Learning, Meaningful Learning

Abstract

Pembelajaran di perguruan tinggi masih banyak bertumpu pada keterampilan berpikir tingkat rendah, sementara gamifikasi yang populer cenderung menempatkan mahasiswa sebagai pemain pasif platform digital. Penelitian tindakan kelas ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan penerapan proyek Board-Game Creation, yakni perancangan permainan papan analog yang memadukan teori Psikologi Pendidikan dengan filsafat pendidikan holistik Abdul Malik Fadjar, serta menelaah perubahan kreativitas dan pembelajaran bermakna mahasiswa. Penelitian mengikuti model Kemmis dan McTaggart dalam dua siklus dengan subjek 45 mahasiswa sarjana yang terbagi dalam sembilan kelompok. Kreativitas dinilai pada produk kelompok (n = 9) menggunakan rubrik analitik yang divalidasi ahli, sedangkan pembelajaran bermakna diukur secara individual (n = 45) dengan kuesioner 20 butir (? = 0,86). Data dianalisis secara deskriptif menggunakan rerata dan N-gain, serta analisis tematik catatan observasi. Rerata kreativitas naik dari 48,50 menjadi 86,40 (N-gain 0,74) dan pembelajaran bermakna dari 52,30 menjadi 88,50 (N-gain 0,76), keduanya berkategori tinggi. Temuan ini mengindikasikan bahwa perancangan permainan analog yang dijangkarkan pada nilai filosofis lokal berpotensi memperdalam keterlibatan kognitif dan afektif mahasiswa dalam konteks kelas yang diteliti, meskipun generalisasinya memerlukan desain dengan kelompok pembanding.

Views: 37Downloads: 5

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(5), 997–1013. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.997

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.

Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Chen, C.-H., & Yang, Y.-C. (2019). Revisiting the effects of project-based learning on students' academic achievement: A meta-analysis investigating moderators. Educational Research Review, 26, 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.11.001

Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification.” In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (pp. 9–15). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040

Fadjar, A. M. (1998). Visi pembaruan pendidikan Islam. LP3NI.

Fadjar, A. M. (2005). Holistika pemikiran pendidikan (A. Barizi, Ed.). RajaGrafindo Persada.

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809

Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing change/gain scores [Unpublished manuscript]. American Educational Research Association, Division D, Measurement and Research Methodology.

Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 3025–3034). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377

Hanus, M. D., & Fox, J. (2015). Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and academic performance. Computers & Education, 80, 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.019

Kafai, Y. B. (2006). Playing and making games for learning: Instructionist and constructionist perspectives for game studies. Games and Culture, 1(1), 36–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412005281767

Kafai, Y. B., & Burke, Q. (2015). Constructionist gaming: Understanding the benefits of making games for learning. Educational Psychologist, 50(4), 313–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1124022

Kapp, K. M. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methods and strategies for training and education. Pfeiffer.

Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2

Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving Schools, 19(3), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480216659733

Mayer, R. E. (2002). Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 226–232. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_4

Nicholson, S. (2015). A RECIPE for meaningful gamification. In T. Reiners & L. C. Wood (Eds.), Gamification in education and business (pp. 1–20). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10208-5_1

Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books.

Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children (M. Cook, Trans.). International Universities Press.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Sailer, M., & Homner, L. (2020). The gamification of learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32(1), 77–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09498-w

Saleem, A. N., Noori, N. M., & Ozdamli, F. (2022). Gamification applications in e-learning: A literature review. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 27(1), 139–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09487-x

Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. Macmillan.

Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). Cambridge University Press.

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press.

Zainuddin, Z., Chu, S. K. W., Shujahat, M., & Perera, C. J. (2020). The impact of gamification on learning and instruction: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Educational Research Review, 30, Article 100326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100326

Downloads

Published

04-11-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Designing Board Game Malik Fadjar untuk Menumbuhkan Pembelajaran Mendalam: Sebuah Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. (2026). Journal of Instructional and Development Researches, 6(5), 817-827. https://doi.org/10.53621/xtmw2f88

Similar Articles

21-30 of 99

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.