Exploration of Multiple Intelligences of High School Students in Physics Subjects as A Basis for Developing Learning Methods
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to describe the profile of multiple intelligences among high school students in physics learning. The goal is to provide a basis for designing more adaptive and personalized instructional strategies that align with students' cognitive strengths. Method: A quantitative descriptive method with a survey approach was employed, involving 101 students from three different classes. Data were collected using a Likert-scale-based multiple intelligences questionnaire encompassing eight intelligence domains: verbal-linguistic, logical-mathematical, visual-spatial, kinesthetic, musical, interpersonal, intrapersonal, and naturalist. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and reliability testing. Results: The findings revealed that intrapersonal (78.320%), interpersonal (77.030%), kinesthetic (76.780%), and naturalist (76.440%) intelligence were the most dominant among students. Verbal-linguistic (70.050%), musical (71.830%), visual-spatial (69.110%), and logical-mathematical (64.500%) also showed notable representation. EFA identified ten principal components that explained 65.040% of the total Variance. Reliability analysis showed that most factors had adequate Cronbach's Alpha values (> 0.700), although some required refinement. Novelty: This study provides updated empirical insights into high school students' multiple intelligences in physics learning, with a focus on the emerging dominance of kinesthetic, intrapersonal, and naturalist intelligence. It also incorporates recent psychometric validation using EFA, underscoring the need for intelligence-based instructional design. The novelty lies in combining psychological profiling with physics-specific pedagogy in a Merdeka Belajar framework.



References
Adeoye, M. A., & Jimoh, H. A. (2023). Problem-Solving Skills Among 21st-Century Learners Toward Creativity and Innovation Ideas. Thinking Skills and Creativity Journal, 6(1), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.23887/tscj.v6i1.62708
Alhusni, H. Z., Habibbulloh, M., Lestari, N. A., Realita, A., Jatmiko, B., & Deta, U. A. (2024). Scientific literacy in physics learning: A bibliometric analysis from 1977 until 2023 and its impact on quality education. E3S Web of Conferences, 513, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202451304012
Alnahdi, G. H. (2020). Are we ready for inclusion? Teachers’ perceived self-efficacy for inclusive education in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 67(2), 182–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2019.1621241
Anwar, M. (2015). Filsafat pendidikan. Kencana.
DePorter, B., & Hernacki, M. (2006). Quantum learning: Membiasakan belajar nyaman dan menyenangkan. PT Mizan Pustaka.
Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (2012). Strategi dan model pembelajaran: Mengajarkan konten dan keterampilan berpikir. Indeks.
Fitri, R. (2019). Multiple intelligences peserta didik kelas X peminatan ilmu sosial dan bahasa lintas minat biologi. Bioeducation, 3(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.2615/5451
Fleetham, M. (2006). Multiple intelligences in practice: Enhancing self-esteem and learning in the classroom. Network Continuum Education.
Gardner, H. (2003). Kecerdasan majemuk (multiple intelligences): Teori dalam praktek. Interaksara.
Hambali, H. (2017). Eksplorasi pembelajaran tadabbur alam dalam meningkatkan kecerdasan naturalis (naturalistic intelligence) dan kecerdasan spiritual (spiritual intelligence) peserta didik SMP Unismuh Makassar. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 5(1), 10-21. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v5i1.345
Hidayat, A., & Hermawan, H. A. (2024). The relationship between emotional intelligence, kinesthetic intelligence, and learning motivation. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 11(8), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v11-i8-2024.125
Husain, F. N. (2023). Impact of multiple intelligences and 21st century skills on future work force. International Education Studies, 16(3), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v16n3p16
Ilham, K. M., Rosyida, I., & Prahani, B. K. (2025). Profiling students’ critical thinking skills in rotational dynamics and integration of problem-based learning with Android-based 3D digital modules. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 5(1), 1302–1313. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2025.01.006
Komang, N. I. Y. S. R. I. (2022). Hubungan antara kecerdasan intrapersonal, sikap disiplin peserta didik terhadap pembelajaran berbasis online. Prosiding Konseling Kearifan Nusantara (KKN), 1(1), 273–280.
Kumar, T., Akhter, S., Yunus, M. M., & Shamsy, A. (2022). Use of music and songs as pedagogical tools in teaching english as foreign language contexts. Education Research International, 2022(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3384067
Laksmi, N. K. ., Yasa, I. K. ., & Mirayani, K. A. M. (2021). The use of animation video as learning media for young. Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 42–52.
Muri, A. Y. (2014). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif & penelitian gabungan. Kencana.
Ni, M., Yang, F., & Liu, M. (2024). Effective application of multiple intelligences theory in music education. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-0501
Oladele, I., Amini, M., Yusuf, R., & Adepoju, M. (2024). Analysis of learning styles and multiple intelligences among pre-service biology educators. Meta: Journal Pendidikan, 8(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.31227/meta.v8i1.2024.5568
Petruţa, G. P. (2013). Multiple intelligences stimulated within the lessons by the practicant students from the Faculty of Sciences. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 76, 676–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.185
Prahani, B. K., Nisa’, K., Suliyanah, S., & Deta, U. A. (2025). Earthquake scientific literacy profile of Indonesian first-year pre-service physics teachers. International Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 14(1), 304–323. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v14i1.30423
Prahani, B. K., Rizki, I. A., Nisa’, K., Citra, N. F., Alhusni, H. Z., & Wibowo, F. C. (2022).
Implementation of online problem based learning assisted by digital book with 3D animations to improve students’ physics problem solving skills in magnetic field subject. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 12(2), 379–396. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1590
Pulikkan, S., & Mazumder, B. (2020). Attitude of teachers towards inclusion of children with disabilities: A study based on contact theory. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 20(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12459
Putra, R. R., Fitri, R., Hartanto, I., & Selaras, G. H. (2020). Multiple intelligences of students in SMAN 1 V Koto Kampung Dalam Padang Pariaman. Jurnal Atrium Pendidikan Biologi, 5(3), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.2656/1700
Rasmitadila, Widyasari, Prasetyo, T., Rachmadtullah, R., Samsudin, A., & Aliyyah, R. R. (2021). General teachers’ experience of the Brain’s natural learning systems-based instructional approach in inclusive classroom. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 95–116. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.1436a
Roldán, S. M., Marauri, J., Aubert, A., & Flecha, R. (2021). How Inclusive Interactive Learning Environments Benefit Students Without Special Needs. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661427
Savolainen, H., Engelbrecht, P., Nel, M., & Malinen, O.-P. (2017). Understanding teachers’ attitudes and self-efficacy in inclusive education: Implications for teacher education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 32(3), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2016.1254966
Sugiyono, S. (2015). Statistika untuk penelitian. Alfabeta.
Sugiyono, S. (2018). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sukarso, A., Widodo, A., Rochintaniawati, D., & Purwianingsih, W. (2019). The contribution of biological practicum learning model based on creative research projects in forming scientific creativity of high school students. STEMEIF (Prosiding), 361–369.
Sukarso, A., Widodo, A., Rochintaniawati, D., & Purwianingsih, W. (2019). The potential of students’ creative disposition as a perspective to develop creative teaching and learning for senior high school biological science. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/2/022092
Thambu, N., Prayitno, H. J., & Zakaria, G. A. N. (2021). Incorporating Active Learning into Moral Education to Develop Multiple Intelligences: A Qualitative Approach. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 3(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v3i1.10064
Walela, A. (2024). Multiple intelligence in the teaching and learning process: A study of Howard Gardner's thought, challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Education, Language, Literature, Arts, Culture and Social Humanities, 2(4), 133–155. https://doi.org/10.59024/ijellacush.v2i4.1006
Walela, A. (2024). Recontextualizing multiple intelligences theory in Indonesian classrooms. International Journal of Inclusive Pedagogy, 3(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.31294/ijip.v3i1.2024.2139
Woodcock, S., Sharma, U., Subban, P., & Hitches, E. (2022). Teacher self-efficacy and inclusive education practices: Rethinking teachers’ engagement with inclusive practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 117, 1-15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103802
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Current Educational Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


