The Hypothetic OMIRE Learning Model to Improve The Scientific Literacy of Prospective Science Teachers
Abstract
Objective: Prospective science teachers must have good scientific literacy skills as critical agents in developing future generations' scientific literacy. However, the scientific literacy skills of prospective science teachers in Indonesia still need to improve. This research tries to formulate the OMIRE learning model to increase the scientific literacy of prospective science teachers. Method: The method used is a literature study with a qualitative research type. Results: The hypothetical OMIRE learning model synthesizes inquiry-based learning models and culture-based learning models to develop the scientific literacy of prospective science teachers. This model is based on several learning theories, including constructivism, Piaget's cognitive development theory, Vygotsky's social constructivist theory, Ausuble's meaningful learning, Bruner's discovery learning, Novak's concept map (mind map), information processing theory, collateral learning theory, boundary crossing metaphor culture, and scientific reconstruction. The hypothetical OMIRE learning model consists of five phases: Observation (O), Mind Mapping (M), Investigation (I), Reconstruction (R), and Evaluation (E). Novelty: The hypothetical OMIRE learning model can develop the scientific literacy of prospective science teachers. Further research needs to be conducted to test the validity, practicality, and effectiveness of the OMIRE learning model in improving the scientific literacy of prospective science teachers.



References
Aditomo, A., & Klieme, E. (2020). Forms of inquiry-based science instruction and their relations with learning outcomes: evidence from high and low-performing education systems. International Journal of Science Education, 42(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1716093
Adnan, Mulbar, U., Sugiarti, & Bahri, A. (2021). Scientific literacy skills of students: Problem of biology teaching in junior high school in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 847–860. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14349a
Al Sultan, A., Henson, H., & Lickteig, D. (2021). Assessing preservice elementary teachers’ conceptual understanding of scientific literacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 102, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103327
AlAli, R., & Wardat, Y. (2024). Low PISA performance students: Factors, perceptions, and improvement strategies. International Journal of Religion, 5(9), 334–348. https://doi.org/10.61707/nve8gj33
Alqawasmi, A., Alsalhi, N. R., & Al Qatawneh, S. S. (2024). The influence of utilizing inquiry-based learninstrategy on science accomplishment of primary students’ stage. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 18(5), 62–76. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v18i05.47011
Arends, R. (2015). Learning to teach (tenth edition). McGraw-Hill Education.
Baltikian, M., Kärkkäinen, S., & Kukkonen, J. (2024). Assessment of scientific literacy levels among secondary school students in Lebanon: Exploring gender-based differences. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(3), 23-40. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14279
Cansiz, M., & Cansiz, N. (2019). Reconceptualizing and field testing the scientific literacy framework by exploring the aspect of scientific literacy in Turkish science curriculum. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 18(5), 681–691. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/19.18.681
Chang, T. C., Lyu, Y. M., Wu, H. C., & Min, K. W. (2024). Introduction of taiwanese literacy-oriented science curriculum and development of an aligned scientific literacy assessment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13930
Dewi, C. A., Khery, Y., & Erna, M. (2019). An ethnoscience study in chemistry learning to develop scientific literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(2), 279–287. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i2.19261
Dewi, Citra Ayu, Erna, M., Martini, Haris, I., & Kundera, I. N. (2021). Effect of contextual collaborative learning based ethnoscience to increase student’s scientific literacy ability. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(3), 525–541. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.88
Fadly, D., Rahayu, S., Dasna, I. W., & Yahmin, Y. (2022). The effectiveness of a SOIE strategy using socio-scientific issues on students chemical literacy. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 237–258. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15114a
Forbes, C. T., Neumann, K., & Schiepe-Tiska, A. (2020). Patterns of inquiry-based science instruction and student science achievement in PISA 2015. International Journal of Science Education, 42(5), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1730017
Heliawati, L., Lidiawati, L., Adriansyah, P. N. A., & Herlina, E. (2022). Ethnochemistry-based adobe flash learning media using indigenous knowledge to improve students’ scientific literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(2), 271–281. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i2.34859
Husamah, H., Suwono, H., Nur, H., & Dharmawan, A. (2022). The development and validation of environmental literacy instrument based on spirituality for prospective science teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(12), 112-125. https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/12732
Ješková, Z., Lukáč, S., Šnajder, Ľ., Guniš, J., Klein, D., & Kireš, M. (2022). Active learning in STEM education with regard to the development of inquiry skills. Education Sciences, 12(10), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100686
Kang, J. (2022). Interrelationship between inquiry-based learning and instructional quality in predicting science literacy. Research in Science Education, 52(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09946-6
Kang, J., & Keinonen, T. (2018). The effect of student-centered approaches on students’ interest and achievement in science: Relevant topic-based, open and guided inquiry-based, and discussion-based approaches. Research in Science Education, 48(4), 110-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9590-2
Kim, S. (2024). Development of an inquiry activity model emphasizing the representation of primary science textbooks. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 23(2), 315–330. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/24.23.315
Lasmana, O. (2024). Exploring local wisdom through project-based learning: A case study of the application of ethnoscience models. Chelonian Conservation And Biology, 19(1), 1–8.
Lubis, S. P. W., Suryadarma, I. G. P., Paidi, & Yanto, B. E. (2022). The effectiveness of problem-based learning with local wisdom oriented to socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15225a
Mcconney, A., Oliver, M. C., Woods-Mcconney, A., Schibeci, R., & Maor, D. (2014). Inquiry, engagement, and literacy in science: a retrospective, cross-national analysis using PISA 2006. Science Education, 98(6), 963–980. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21135
Meulenbroeks, R., van Rijn, R., & Reijerkerk, M. (2024). Fostering secondary school science students’ intrinsic motivation by inquiry-based learning. Research in Science Education, 54(3), 339–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-023-10139-0
NRC. (1996). National science education standards. National Academies Press.
Nuangchalerm, P., El Islami, R. A. Z., & Prasertsang, P. (2022). Science attitude on environmental conservation of thai and indonesian novice science teacher students. International Journal of STEM Education for Sustainability, 2(2), 148–155. https://doi.org/10.53889/ijses.v2i2.62
OCED. (2018). PISA 2018 for development assessment and analytical framework. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/pisa-2018-assessment-and-analytical-framework-b25efab8-en.htm
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. OECD Publishing.
Pahrudin, A., Irwandani, Triyana, E., Oktarisa, Y., & Anwar, C. (2019). The analysis of pre-service physics teachers in scientific literacy: Focus on the competence and knowledge aspects. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i1.15728
Parmin, P., Savitri, E. N., Khusniati, M., & El Islami, R. A. Z. (2022). The prospective science teachers’ skills in reconstructing indigenous knowledge of local culture on breast milk using pare (Momordica charantia). International Journal of Educational Research Open, 3, 10-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100193
Ploj Virtič, M. (2022). Teaching science & technology: components of scientific literacy and insight into the steps of research. International Journal of Science Education, 44(12), 1916–1931. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2105414
Purnawati, R. (2024). Scientific literacy by incorporating local terms and sociocultural phenomena into science teaching-learning process. PROJECT, 7(2), 433–448.
Ramdiah, S., Abidinsyah, A., Royani, M., Husamah, H., & Fauzi, A. (2020). South kalimantan local wisdom-based biology learning model. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 639-645. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.639
Randolph, J. J. (2009). A guide to writing the dissertation literature review. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 14(13), 1-22.
Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy / science literacy. Handbook of Research on Science Education, 729–780.
Romero-Ariza, M., Quesada, A., Abril, A. M., Sorensen, P., & Oliver, M. C. (2020). Highly recommended and poorly used: English and spanish science teachers’ views of inquiry-based learning (IBL) and its enactment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/109658
Sholahuddin, A., Susilowati, E., Prahani, B. K., & Erman, E. (2021). Using a cognitive style-based learning strategy to improve students’ environmental knowledge and scientific literacy. International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 791–808. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14445a
Slavin, R. E. (2018). Educational psychology : Theory and practice. Pearson.
Strat, T. T. S., & Jegstad, K. M. (2022). Norwegian teacher educators’ reflections on inquiry-based teaching and learning in science teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2022.2125623
Suprapto, N., Prahani, B., & Deta, U. (2021). Research trend on ethnoscience through bibliometric analysis (2011-2020) and the contribution of indonesia. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-Journal), 1-23.
Suryati, S., Yusran, K., Asma, N., Hendrawani, & Sri, R. (2020). Identification of science literacy competency of chemistry teacher candidate. Jurnal Zarah, 8(1), 50–55.
Teig, N. (2024). Uncovering student strategies for solving scientific inquiry tasks: Insights from student process data in PISA. Research in Science Education, 54(2), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-023-10134-5
Uslan, Abdullah, N., Imami, M. K. W., & Aiman, U. (2024). The effectiveness of the local knowledge-based module (LKBM) to improve students’ scientific literacy and thinking skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 13(1), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v13i1.47561
Verawati, N. N. S. P., & Wahyudi, W. (2024). Raising the issue of local wisdom in science learning and its impact on increasing students’ scientific literacy. International Journal of Ethnoscience and Technology in Education, 1(1), 42-51. https://doi.org/10.33394/ijete.v1i1.10881
Wang, H. H., Hong, Z. R., She, H. C., Smith, T. J., Fielding, J., & Lin, H. shyang. (2022). The role of structured inquiry, open inquiry, and epistemological beliefs in developing secondary students’ scientific and mathematical literacies. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00329-z
Wang, L., Yuan, Y., & Wang, G. (2024). The construction of civil scientific literacy in china from the perspective of science education. Science and Education, 33(1), 249–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00367-7
WEF. (2015). New Vision for Education: Unlocking the Potencial of Technology. World Economic Forum.
Wiyarsi, A., Prodjosantoso, A. K., & Nugraheni, A. R. E. (2021). Promoting students’ scientific habits of mind and chemical literacy using the context of socio-scientific issues on the inquiry learning. Frontiers in Education, 6, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.660495
Yani, A., Amin, M., Rohman, F., Suarsini, E., & Rijal, M. (2021). Pre-service biology teacher’s perception on local environment problems as contextual learning resources. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(3), 768–780. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i3.21091
Yuliana, I., Cahyono, M. E., Widodo, W., & Irwanto, I. (2021). The effect of ethnoscience-themed picture books embedded within contextbased learning on students’ scientific literacy. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2021(92), 317–334. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2021.92.16
Zidny, R., & Eilks, I. (2020). Integrating perspectives from indigenous knowledge and Western science in secondary and higher chemistry learning to contribute to sustainability education. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy, 16, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scp.2020.100229
Zidny, R., & Eilks, I. (2022). Learning about pesticide use adapted from ethnoscience as a contribution to green and sustainable chemistry education. Education Sciences, 12(4), 23-35. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12040227
Zidny, R., Sjöström, J., & Eilks, I. (2020). A multi-perspective reflection on how indigenous knowledge and related ideas can improve science education for sustainability. Science and Education, 29(1), 145–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00100-x
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Current Educational Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


