The Practicality of Innovative Blended Learning Through The Meaning (IBLTM) Model Making to Improve Science Literacy
Abstract
Objective: Science literacy is essential for learners because it allows them to understand, analyze, and apply scientific concepts in everyday life and make decisions based on scientific information. This study aims to describe the practicality of the Innovative Blended Learning Model through Interpretation to improve students' science literacy. Method: The research method used was development research. Data collection used observation instruments. Data analysis was implemented using descriptive statistics for practicality tests. Results: The results of the trial showed that the level of practicality of the IBLTM learning model is high, which means that the IBLTM learning model is practical enough to be implemented in biology learning. Novelty: This research presents new findings related to the practicality of the IBLTM model by emphasizing how this model facilitates the process of deep meaning and active involvement of students in learning.
Abstract View: 83 
PDF Download: 58
Similarity Check Download: 11
References
Afifah, D. S. N., & Nafi’an, M. I. (2019). Analizing of field independent and dependent students’ understanding in solving statistical problems based on ontosemiotic approach. IOP Publishing, 1321(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1321/2/022100
Aminah, N., Sukestiyarno, Y., Wardono, W., & Cahyono, A. N. (2022). Computational thinking process of prospective mathematics teacher in solving Diophantine linear equation problems. RU Publications, 11(3), 1495–1507. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.3.1495
Andy, W. H., & Kardoyo, K. (2020). Human resources development analysis based on total quality management at Daarul Qur’an Elementary School Semarang. Atlantis Press, 443, 336–340. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200620.065
Asiri, A. A. M. (2018). Scientific inquiry-based teaching practices as perceived by science teachers. Science and Education Publishing, 6(4), 297–307. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-6-4-2
Balaj, T. A., Deussan, C., Diwakar, R., Wenzel, C., & Eikemo. (2024). Effects of education on adult mortality: A global systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Public Health, 9(3), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00306-7
Candiasa, I. M., Santiyadnya, N., Sukajaya, I. N., & Sindu, I. G. P. (2019). Example-based learning for vocational education: Adopted from Balinese heuristics learning. State University of Yogyakarta, 9(3), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v9i3.27017
Darayseh, A. A. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on modes of teaching science in UAE schools. Journal of Education and Practice, 11(20), 110–115. https://doi.org/10.7176/jep/11-20-13
Dubauskienė, N., Valinevičius, A., Andriukaitis, D., Žilys, M., Navikas, D., Markevičius, V., & Merfeldas, A. (2020). Innovative teaching methods for engineering students. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/elektro49696.2020.9130347
Emran, M. G. I., Barma, R., Khan, A. H., & Roy, M. (2024). Reasons behind the water crisis and its potential health outcomes. European Journal of Development Studies, 10(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejdevelop.YEAR.VOL.ISSUE.ID
Hashim, N., & Hamidon, Z. (2022, January 30). Blended learning in technical and vocational education and training (TVET) training institute. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11(1), 837–860. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v11-i1/12343
Istiqomah, W., Purwanto, A., & Medriati, R. (2023). The influence of problem-based learning on science literacy ability of physics students. Tanjungpura University, 14(2), 188–188. https://doi.org/10.26418/jpmipa.v14i2.65296
Kelana, J. B., Wardani, D. S., Arga, H. S. P., & Ruqoyyah, S. (2021). Science learning of primary teachers’ students: An analysis study in COVID-19 era. IOP Publishing, 1842(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1842/1/012014
Kelp, N. C., McCartney, M., Sarvary, M. A., Shaffer, J. F., & Wolyniak, M. J. (2023). Developing science literacy in students and society: Theory, research, and practice. American Society for Microbiology, 24(2), 4-15. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00058-23
Muharram, A. P., & Purwarianti, A. (2024). Enhancing natural language inference performance with knowledge graph for COVID-19 automated fact-checking in Indonesian language. ITB Journal Publisher, 20(10), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.00061
Ngabekti, S., Partaya, P., Hb, P., & Nugroho, B. T. (2020). Students’ literacy profile on STEM-blended learning implementation in ecosystem material. IOP Publishing, 1567(2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/2/022066
Nurhasanah, A., Ramadhanti, S., Utami, S., & Putri, F. A. (2022). Improving elementary school students' understanding of the concept through meaningful learning in David Ausubel's perspective. Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai, 6(4), 5728–5734. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.2935
Octavia, U. D., Aunurrahman, A., & Darajad, A. (2021). Students' perceptions of the implementation of blended learning method in English language teaching (ELT). Journal of English Language Teaching and Education, 2(2), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.31571/jelte.v2i2.81
Putera, R. E., & Ariany, R. (2021, January 1). Blended learning in public service course during the pandemic Covid-19. Atlantis Press, 506, 387–390. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210202.069
Putri, A. A., & Yunani, A. (2024). Study on standardizing working time: A case of XYZ retail store in Bandung, Indonesia. International Research Journal of Economics and Management Studies, 3(2), 86–94. https://doi.org/10.56472/25835238/IRJEMS-V3I2P112
Putri, M. N. (2021). The application of problem-based learning model to increase students’ achievement in Indonesian subject. SHEs: Conference Series, 3(4), 336–336. https://doi.org/10.20961/shes.v3i4.53354
Rahman, N. A., Arifin, N. F., Manaf, M., Ahmad, M. I., Zin, N. A. M., & Jamaludin, M. Z. (2020). Students’ perception in blended learning among science and technology cluster students. IOP Publishing, 1496(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1496/1/012012
Rahmawan, S., Rahayu, D. S., Siahaan, P., Hendayana, S., & Sendi, S. (2020). The quality of level of inquiry-based lesson design through lesson study. Atlantis Press, 438, 135–139. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200513.031
Rahmayani, N. S., Arifin, M., & Sunarya, Y. (2019). Profile of senior high school students’ scientific literacy in Banda Aceh. IOP Publishing, 1157, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042024
Raud, Z., Vodovozov, V., Serbin, A., & Petlenkov, E. (2018). Motivating students to avoid academic dishonesty in learning engineering courses. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/educon.2018.8363389
Rochman, C., Nasudin, D., & Rokayah, R. (2019). Science literacy on science technology engineering and math (STEM) learning in elementary schools. IOP Publishing, 1318(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1318/1/012050
Rubini, B., Ardianto, D., & Pursitasari, I. D. (2019). Teachers’ perception regarding integrated science learning and science literacy. Atlantis Press, 523, 364–366. https://doi.org/10.2991/aes-18.2019.82
Rusilowati, A., Astuti, B., & Rahman, N. H. A. (2019). How to improve students’ scientific literacy. IOP Publishing, 1170, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1170/1/012028
Sabtiawan, W. B., Sari, D. A. P., Purnomo, A. R., & Widodo, W. (2021). Blended learning for undergraduate students: Validity, practicality, and effectivity. IOP Publishing, 1899(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1899/1/012170
Sari, R., Napitupulu, T. A., & Rudy. (2018). Evaluation blended learning model in higher education. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 11(9), 417–422. https://doi.org/10.1109/icimtech.2018.8528115
Setiawan, F., Mustaji, M., & Widodo, W. (2018). The development of learning tools based on SETS with interactive multimedia to improve science learning outcomes. Atlantis Press, 173, 105–108. https://doi.org/10.2991/icei-17.2018.28
Sinaga, M. I., Sinaga, B., & Napitupulu, E. (2021). Analysis of students' mathematical communication ability in the application of Vygotsky's theory at high school level. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 4(1), 132–144. https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v4i1.1567
Sulisworo, D. (2018). Blended learning: Improving students' motivation in English teaching learning process. Aktuell Verlag, 6(1), 163–170. https://doi.org/10.18298/ijlet.2434
Tarigan, M. A. B., Perangin-Angin, R. B. B., & Saragi, D. (2019). Influence of guided inquiry learning model and social interactions on PPKn lesson result of 5th grade students in primary school (SDN) 040444 Kabanjahe school year 2017/2018. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 2(3), 216–222. https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v2i3.366
Wu, S., Cao, Y., Cui, J., Li, R., Qian, H., Jiang, B., & Zhang, W. (2024). A comprehensive exploration of personalized learning in smart education: From student modeling to personalized recommendations. Journal of the ACM, 37(4), 1–82. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.00061
Xu, Y., & Tang, Q. (2021). The reform of modern education during the COVID-19 pandemic. IOP Publishing, 1748(4), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1748/4/042051
Yasaroh, S., Jumadi, J., & Hestiana, H. (2022, April 3). Constraints to learning science with an online learning system in the era of the Covid-19 pandemic. Unimus Press, 10(1), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.26714/jps.10.1.2022.15-21
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Current Educational Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Abstract viewed = 83 times
PDF downloaded = 58 times
Similarity Check downloaded = 11 times
